data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa0a/ffa0a47e2ec6dc27680ff0e94671e82e416f544b" alt="Twitter triumph studios"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b5631/b5631d24843f2ac328266cb422aad9a3e3010993" alt="twitter triumph studios twitter triumph studios"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/924f9/924f991950da73dffbea388ae4214fb249ac20c1" alt="twitter triumph studios twitter triumph studios"
I also enjoy campaigns in strategies and imo in Pl. became more like other 'slower' 4x strategies I've got 482 hours both in AOW3 and Pl.(by chance), and I feel like playtime in AoW 3 was less grindy and I overall played more games because they took less time. I know some people like it and there are good sides to it, but imo It made the strategic layer more repetitive and added more tedious micro, especially once you've figured it all out. I feel that in pursuit of making the strategic layer deeper you decided to borrow mechanics from other successfull 4x games. Originally posted by TriumphJordi:Well I'm sorry to hear that, would you mind sharing why you feel that way or what gives you that idea? Well, it's kinda weird to criticise the game years after release and everything has already been said about Planetfall's good and bad sides by many people, but since you asked.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ffa0a/ffa0a47e2ec6dc27680ff0e94671e82e416f544b" alt="Twitter triumph studios"